PaulSpoerry.com

You found me… insights on technology, philosophy, Windows, hacking and more.
  • rss
  • Home
  • Archive
  • Links
  • Contact
  • Categories
  • Search
  • Snazzy Archives
  • About
  • Photos

15 Answers to Creationist’s Evolutionary Rebuttals

February 26, 2007

This is an informative article based on a pro-evolution standpoint from Scientific American. When Charles Darwin introduced the theory of evolution through natural selection 143 years ago, the scientists of the day argued over it fiercely, but the massing evidence from paleontology, genetics, zoology, molecular biology and other fields gradually established evolution’s truth beyond reasonable doubt. Today that battle has been won everywhere–except in the public imagination.

Embarrassingly, in the 21st century, in the most scientifically advanced nation the world has ever known, creationists can still persuade politicians, judges and ordinary citizens that evolution is a flawed, poorly supported fantasy. They lobby for creationist ideas such as “intelligent design” to be taught as alternatives to evolution in science classrooms. As this article goes to press, the Ohio Board of Education is debating whether to mandate such a change. Some antievolutionists, such as Philip E. Johnson, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley and author of Darwin on Trial, admit that they intend for intelligent-design theory to serve as a “wedge” for reopening science classrooms to discussions of God.

Besieged teachers and others may increasingly find themselves on the spot to defend evolution and refute creationism. The arguments that creationists use are typically specious and based on misunderstandings of (or outright lies about) evolution, but the number and diversity of the objections can put even well-informed people at a disadvantage.

To help with answering them, the following list rebuts some of the most common “scientific” arguments raised against evolution. It also directs readers to further sources for information and explains why creation science has no place in the classroom.

(Poster’s note… I don’t have a problem with people believing in creationism. For most people, I believe faith is a good thing, I just don’t like them pushing Creationism aka Intelligent Design in school science classes)

read more | digg story

Comments
No Comments »
Categories
Politics, Religion
Tags
california at berkeley, charles darwin, classroom poster, creation science, darwin on trial, e johnson, informative article, intelligent design theory, law professor, misunderstandings, molecular biology, ohio board of education, ordinary citizens, pro evolution, public imagination, reasonable doubt, science classrooms, scientific american, theory of evolution, university of california at berkeley
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

Google Search

Google Friend Connect

Tag Cloud

ajax amazon barack obama bittorrent blog facebook firefox gadget Gadgets game Gmail google Google Chrome HTC Touch humor iGoogle john mccain launch Linux menu search microsoft microsoft windows Mozilla Firefox open source operating system Politics Religion Ron Paul Sprint Touch start menu tabs target united states user interface video Vista vista tweak Vista Tweaks wikipedia Windows Windows Mobile windows vista windows xp Wordpress youtube

Onlywire

rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox