I wasn't expecting a afternoon promo video from Lockheed that starts with a dubstep intro either but that's what their Skunkworks project just dropped on us. Lockheed expects to be able to build a prototype compact reactor in five years. If everything goes well, the design could "be developed and deployed in as little as ten years." If they pull this off then they say we could have truly clean energy, one that we can export without fears of it being turned into a military weapon, and that it could be as small as a jet engine (and literally be put on a jet to power it), as well as scale up to much larger sizes, plug into the existing grid and "The 100-MW unit would provide sufficient power for up to 80,000 homes in a power-hungry U.S. city."
MOAR here: http://aviationweek.com/technology/skunk-works-reveals-compact-fusion-reactor-details
Frank Merchant says
Yes please!
Thomas Wrobel says
Fingers crossed. Between this,the higgs, spacex, skylon and (maybe) Emdrive the future seems to finally be coming.
Paul Spoerry says
Now I want my flying car… Or at least a self driving one.
Thomas Wrobel says
Self driving in 10 years looks plausible in some areas at least.
Niklas Malmberg says
Skylon and its Saber engines will be that which ignites the spacemining industry!
shamim mizan says
Meezan33
mark appleby says
It's great to see a young man like this, Let's hope nobody with money or power steals, extorts or stifles his progress, like what was done to Tesla. We would already be enjoying free power if he wasn't financially forced down.
Tsarai benard says
Its nt b lyk that guyz
George Rivera says
Finally, quick before energy companies get a hold of it and find a way to charge an large chunk of money.
Blanket Dog says
hi
Paul Spoerry says
This is Lockheed Martin… nobody is stealing anything from them.
Deedee Smith says
Cool beens
Deedee Smith says
Cool beens!:)
ian morrow says
I know I had compact fusion when I farted before I think that's N.A.S.A. at the front door. What to do what to do
mark appleby says
That's good
Contessa Nowacki says
Lol!!! +ian morrow
mariah kelly says
lol
ian morrow says
I've let N.A.S.A. in and joy of joys they want my arse to power the next rocket to mars. I am seriously thinking about it. I hear the money there paying is great
Rickey Brooks says
.
Contessa Nowacki says
+ian morrow you are hilarious…
Frank Merchant says
Lockheed Martin stands to make billions just in military contracts. Add in civilian and their place in history is set.
If it works. PLEASE LET IT WORK!
Paul Naugles says
Interesting.
Jacob Noon says
Problem is all of the neutrons created after the reaction. They are heavy and basically blow the shielding away after a while. Talked with a professor I have that has worked at ITER.
Deb W. says
Phyllis fay
Sahil Umar says
Nothing to say about this
aahhmmaad aahhmmaad says
سكس
Chill Out says
+Jacob Noon The blown shielding, that's with the Tokamak design. This seems to be something else entirely.
Jacob Noon says
+Chill Out my fault. Your right. I got mixed up with another article.
aahhmmaad aahhmmaad says
+Rickey Brooks سكس
aahhmmaad aahhmmaad says
سكس
Chris Pohrte says
You make this work and you won't need to find another job. The next challenge will find you.
Deepak Gora says
jodha akabar
abhishek crz says
+Deepak Gora how are you
Abdul wajid says
nice
Nuzhat Siraj says
U
Dhinal Dhinesh says
Supper
ELVIS SUZAN says
Hello
Thy Thea says
Hello
ELVIS SUZAN says
Hl
ELVIS SUZAN says
U look nice
nishanth kunduchy says
+Deedee Smith haiii
Sujeet Singh says
sunset singh
sharad sonkamble says
nice
Rick Bagnerise says
'll mm
, vcv Lloyds ppl, c vHg x
Rick Bagnerise says
,no
Rbd
L
KING DINGALING says
+Paul Spoerry you WAS being sarcastic, wasn't you? Lockheed Martin F-35 (the most expensive fighter program) stolen by China.
Rick Bagnerise says
R
Mychelle Mandap says
Hi
Mychelle Mandap says
Be carefull
Mychelle Mandap says
Wat
Dhinal Dhinesh says
Hiiii
John Rutene says
nice
Paul Spoerry says
Stealing pieces of a design is entirely different than "stealing something". The J-20's engines can't even be figured out yet and then keep swapping in old Soviet Fighter engines (though they did announce recently a massive investment in R&D in that area in an attempt to catch the rest for the world).
KING DINGALING says
+Paul Spoerry American officials have said that they think the Chinese have stolen their top secret stealth technology. I agree that it COULD just be a diamond encrusted turd but the Chinese have been caught trying to pay off workers to see top secret designs in the past. The Chinese jet doesn't just look a BIT like the F-35, it looks the double of it and it was seen VERY soon after the F-35 so it's highly likely they got the design.
Robert Whisenhunt says
One issue that I can see, at least with placing this into an airplane, is that almost all fusion reactions give off neutrons. Because of this, there will have to be shielding around the reactor. The only reactions that don't output neutrons are ones that involve He-3 (which is absurdly rare on Earth) or heavier elements, such as Li-6. The problem with the heavier reactions is that they take even higher temperatures and pressures to make them occur. The easier reactions are once that run off of deuterium and tritium, but since those fuels are rare (and tritium is radioactive), the energy still won't be cheap until we can get to the point of running off of good old H-1. But again, shielding will be needed due to neutrons and gamma rays. So, color me skeptical, especially about putting these reactors on planes.
Richard Quick says
+Robert Whisenhunt They plan to adopt the Boron11 fuel in the commerical reactor which produces three alpha's and no neutrons.
Mathias Willems says
+Robert Whisenhunt Robert, the walls of the reactor will probably be made of lithium, neutron hits that wall, gives of tritium, they'd only need to add deuterium. Neutron escape is very minimal I know, don't know how much exacly but very low.
Mathias Willems says
+Mathias Willems Pretty funny that Nations are spending billions, if not trillions on the ITER project and Lockheed manages to do it on it's own(years faster than ITER).There was also news about the E-CAT supposing to work, very sceptical machine but if that would be true someone just invented a fusion reactor in his garage. LOL.
shed sheb says
Hi
KING DINGALING says
Low.
Mee says
+Mathias Willems E-CAT was just a scam it wasn't anything. And the ITER project is very different thing. They are working on a fusion plants to connect to the public electric grid aka not a military application for one thing, and its aimed at high power output.
Lockheed are looking at making them smaller for military purpose with less output, i don't know what a truck sized reactor would be useful for in the commercial world. The output is not going to power homes, it would be enough to power planes and ships, but i doubt commercial companies would buy fusion reactors for planes – compared to the price of fuel it is a no brainer to stick with fuel. It would also cost a lot of re-engineer the planes to use the new energy source. Equally i imagine it weights more than the fuel too. So until companies need to switch to fusion they obviously won't because it costs heck of a lot of money.
Mychelle Mandap says
W
KING DINGALING says
XYZ
shed sheb says
Yes
Endless Infinity says
They're building the Iter reactor…RIGHT NOW! Fusion is here.
0730Ender says
+Endless Infinity
ITER is an important fusion experiment, but it's nowhere near a commercial fusion reactor. It's gain will be half of what is needed for a working reactor, and its pulse length is much too short. Indeed, it would be great if someone were able to build a compact reactor, but this group isn't giving enough details to evaluate if what they say is feasible. For the time being I'll remain on the sceptics side.
Mathias Willems says
+Mee Mee, you should lookup the latest news on the Ecat, it might still be a scam but independent researchers have found crazy things.
For lockheed, they state it will be used for commercial use too, scale this up x10 and you 1gigawatt, that a pretty darn big nuclear fission plant you would need for that. YOu don't know anything about the price right now, so statements that it will not be used for in planes or such are not well placed I find. As with everything it will cost a lot in the begin but as mass production kicks in it can get cheaper. Btw materials the size of a truck will not cost billions. I think if the tech succeeds they will try to make as much money with it, so making this available for the masses is a logical next step. Curious how the oil companies would respond to this.
Regarding the planes, do you know how much it costs to tank a plane for a year… thats a very big bunch of $$$ 25 kilos of deutermium isn't gonna cost even one hundreth of that.
prem chand says
Union Is Straingth
Carson Thaler says
"without fears of it being turned into a military weapon… "
You clearly are unfamiliar with our nation's military history…
Mychelle Mandap says
Hello good morning
Douglas Smith says
+0730Ender , you're scared.
Carson Thaler says
Fear has little to do with the facts… Facts are quite objective where as fear is subjective.
Carson Thaler says
"Power hungry US city"? … or powerfully inefficient US city…
0730Ender says
+Douglas Smith
There's nothing to be scared about.
Angela Webb says
Do you have girlfriend or wife
Carson Thaler says
Why the curiosity? It's not even peripheral to the subject matter.
Ning Zhang says
+Mathias Willems
This sounds like there is a high probability of neutron interaction with the wall. Anything to back that up?