PaulSpoerry.com

Social Media, technology, and geeky stuff for your brain.

  • Home
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • Categories
    • Google+ Posts
    • Site news
    • Tech
      • Android
      • Apple
      • Chrome
      • Gadgets
      • Hacking
      • Linux
      • OSX
      • Privacy
      • Web Life
        • Bittorrent
        • Facebook
        • FireFox
        • GMail
        • Google
        • Google+
        • Twitter
        • WordPress
        • Windows
          • Windows 7
    • Google+: Getting Started Guides
    • Games
    • Meditation
    • Politics
    • Science
    • That’s freakin hilarious
  • Code
    • FreeImageZoom
    • Post Editor for Google+™
    • The Plus Editor
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Google+ Posts / The Myers-Briggs rests on wholly unproven theories

The Myers-Briggs rests on wholly unproven theories

April 15, 2015 by Paul Spoerry 9 Comments



Why the Myers-Briggs test is totally meaningless
It’s no more scientifically valid than a BuzzFeed quiz.

The wildly popular test is based on Carl Jung's principles and were later adapted into a test by Katherine Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers, a pair of Americans who had no formal training in psychology.

Vox explains, the Myers-Briggs test is based on personality types developed in the 1940s that have little connection to any real data. More problematic, though, is that it classifies personalities by a binary preference for a particular trait. In reality, however, most people exist on a spectrum between the two and can vary between them from week to week:
"With most traits, humans fall on different points along a spectrum. If you ask people whether they prefer to think or feel, or whether they prefer to judge or perceive, the majority will tell you a little of both. Jung himself admitted as much, noting that the binaries were useful ways of thinking about people, but writing that “there is no such thing as a pure extravert or a pure introvert. Such a man would be in the lunatic asylum.”"

There there's this from Wikipedia: "The interesting — and somewhat alarming — fact about the MBTI is that, despite its popularity, it has been subject to sustained criticism by professional psychologists for over three decades. One problem is that it displays what statisticians call low "test-retest reliability." So if you retake the test after only a five-week gap, there's around a 50% chance that you will fall into a different personality category compared to the first time you took the test." – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers%E2%80%93Briggs_Type_Indicator#Reliability

Check this out on Google+

Filed Under: Google+ Posts Tagged With: Reliability, Wednesday

About Paul Spoerry

I’m a groovy cat who’s into technology, Eastern Thought, and house music. I’m a proud and dedicated father to the coolest little guy on the planet (seriously, I'm NOT biased). I’m fascinated by ninjas, the Internet, and anybody who can balance objects on their nose for long periods of time.

I have a utility belt full of programming languages and a database of all my knowledge on databases... I practice code fu. Oh, I've also done actual Kung Fu, and have a black belt in Tae Kwon Do.

I run. I meditate. I dance. I blog at PaulSpoerry.com, tweet @PaulSpoerry, and I'm here on Google+.

I'm currently work for IBM developing web enabled insurance applications for IBM and support and develop a non-profit called The LittleBigFund.

Comments

  1. Travis Owens says

    April 15, 2015 at 11:06 am

    The reason why these are appealing to people is easy: labeling. Humans want to categorize and label things, even if there's no gain by doing so. Labels are used to pre-judge and assume. *Nothing good comes out of these habits.*

  2. jd quinitchette (CrazyLikeABOSS) says

    April 15, 2015 at 11:38 am

    That's why it made me mad when somebody round heah was tossing around the word 'martyr' with liberality.

  3. Jason Honingford says

    April 15, 2015 at 12:10 pm

    All cops be on the lookout for an INFJ headed northbound on 41, probably going home for some alone time.

  4. James Garman says

    April 15, 2015 at 7:47 pm

    Doesn't mean the Myers-Briggs test is meaningless. If the test wan't accurate to at least some degree it would have been forgotten about years ago. I mean, it says my personality type will take over the world. How, loyal subjects, can I ignore that?

  5. Paul Spoerry says

    April 15, 2015 at 7:53 pm

    I think it means exactly that.

  6. James Garman says

    April 15, 2015 at 8:03 pm

    YOU WILL BE PUNISHED FOR YOUR DISSIDENCE!!

  7. West Kagle says

    April 16, 2015 at 8:03 am

    I have a question. As you spend 24/7 with yourself, and assuming you're not completely clueless, how do you not know what kind of personality you have? Why is this test even needed?

  8. James Garman says

    April 16, 2015 at 12:34 pm

    It points out traits you may not realize you have. For example, some personalities are more likely to have issues with addiction or others focus on irrelevant details when stressed. There are pros and cons to every personality.

  9. Paul Spoerry says

    April 16, 2015 at 12:49 pm

    Except that it doesn't point those things out. It's been flat out rejected by psychologists for years, and "it displays what statisticians call low "test-retest reliability." So if you retake the test after only a five-week gap, there's around a 50% chance that you will fall into a different personality category compared to the first time you took the test." "

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright © 2023 · Epik on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in