We May Have Dramatically Misunderstood the Shapes of Black Holes
Even if you didn’t see Interstellar, you’ve probably heard about how black holes have an “event horizon” — and once you pass it, you’re mashed into multi-dimensional mush. But now, some physicists believe we got it all wrong. Black holes are more like fuzzy balls of cotton, with no event horizons at all.
We've been wrong about black holes… they are more like fuzzy balls of cotton
Astrophysics Porn! I go to sleep every night with a space documentary playing!
These two theories are not in opposition; the dense stellar core may be visualized as a fuzzball of vibrating quantum strings, but it resides at the bottom of the steep gravity well we only see as a black hole (mouth) in space.
My theory is that black hole isn't a gravity well but more like a hair dryer
of course its misunderstood as its all guess work based on other guess work. Good luck with that
Time and distance are not the same there as here, regardless.
hmm a stringy black hole
I have a few problems with this hypothesis. First of all strings cannot be tested so even though the theory is elegant and has a lot of theoretical support for it there is no physical evidence yet. Second is that to base a hypothesis on an unproven hypothesis.. well you get my point.
lol
+Le Mont Bennett !!Me too!! I listen to YouTube Brian Greene, Sean Caroll, Morgan Freeman, Niel Degrasse Tyson, Royal Institute and more. Just can't get enough.
Shouldn't the mass distribution and therefore gravity pull on the surface of the black hole be equal all across the surface of the black hole? If it is a "fuzzball" like, then it should mean that at some surface place there is more mass and gravity than at the other place. And if so, there have to be a spot on the surface of the black hole with mass/ gravity sufficiently low for light to escape, which by the way doesn't happen (probably). I am not an expert, at all.
My theory is that a black hole is like a vaccum cleaner… Sucks in everything and enlarges in volume it has no shape (in depth) and is bound by the gravity it gets defined and explodes when the mass gets greater then the gravity of event horizon to form a big bang type of expanding universe again….
Just sayiń….. 😁
+Yash Trivedi interesting but no. It is the mass and its pressure that makes the black hole in the first place. Atoms are mostly empty space and it's the force of the electrons that holds them apart or stops your finger from going through a table. Once the electrons are out of the equation as in a neutron star then it is the force of the protons holding things apart. Once that force is overcome then a black hole collapse. The mass is all there except electrons but they account for a very small portion.
+Yash Trivedi Energy cannot leave the black hole, e.g. light, [edited: apart from black-body radiation. But such radiation would theoretically result in evaporation of the BH]. For explosion to happen, the black hole will need to convert matter (that defines mass) in to energy, like stars do. Besides, the more matter introduced in to the BH the greater mass it becomes, the greater gravity should be produced, therefore more energy [edited: conversion] will be needed to overcome the [edited: increasing] gravity. Or, were you referring to a breaking of a surface tension of the BH? Which by the way shouldn't happen, since you still need sufficient energy to break surface tension in a first place. Cause if you get enough energy at the surface level to break the surface tension and release the [edited: surface and inner] matter of BH, therefore reducing BH mass, in to space, than you still need to contain enough energy to overcome the gravity of the break-away matter from collapsing on to self or BH again, [edited: since under own gravitational pull of expelled mater] there will be reduction of initial energy (
assuming the force of gravity at the surface of the BH is less then at the center of the BHwrong assumption, gravity at surface of BH is greater then at the center).black holes are fiction. it doesnt matter if you dont understand them. it only matters that you are entertained by the idea, and, if you can scam it, get money for extending the myth.
+497362 _ wrong
+497362 _ couldn't agree more! It has been scientifically proven that you live in a celestial sphere!
science is just like religion…made up!
this is whats up…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCyZuW_tNhM&list=RDMMNvlE14cM-zk&index=14
+pierotte pepe Vassau then you have no scientific understanding.
ok
Electric universe !
+Charles Spears indeed!