PaulSpoerry.com

Social Media, technology, and geeky stuff for your brain.

  • Home
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • Categories
    • Google+ Posts
    • Site news
    • Tech
      • Android
      • Apple
      • Chrome
      • Gadgets
      • Hacking
      • Linux
      • OSX
      • Privacy
      • Web Life
        • Bittorrent
        • Facebook
        • FireFox
        • GMail
        • Google
        • Google+
        • Twitter
        • WordPress
        • Windows
          • Windows 7
    • Google+: Getting Started Guides
    • Games
    • Meditation
    • Politics
    • Science
    • That’s freakin hilarious
  • Code
    • FreeImageZoom
    • Post Editor for Google+™
    • The Plus Editor
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Google+ Posts / Alexa, what's the best way to remove bloodstains from shag carpet?

Alexa, what's the best way to remove bloodstains from shag carpet?

December 28, 2016 by Paul Spoerry 9 Comments

 

Amazon refuses to comply with police request for Amazon Echo recordings in murder case.

Makes me feel better about the suite of Dots I got for the holiday! It also shows just how little the courts and police understand about some of our always-on/listening technology. This was a blatant fishing expedition that… unless the murdered would have literally said, "Alexa, what's the most efficient way to murder someone?" there's nothing that Alexa has that would be useful to them. Sure it's always listening… but it's doing so passively. It doesn't jump to action until it hears it's keyphrase signaling it to jump into action about your query.

src: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161227/12042636351/amazon-refuses-to-comply-with-police-request-amazon-echo-recordings-murder-case.shtml

Check this out on Google+

Filed Under: Google+ Posts

About Paul Spoerry

I’m a groovy cat who’s into technology, Eastern Thought, and house music. I’m a proud and dedicated father to the coolest little guy on the planet (seriously, I'm NOT biased). I’m fascinated by ninjas, the Internet, and anybody who can balance objects on their nose for long periods of time.

I have a utility belt full of programming languages and a database of all my knowledge on databases... I practice code fu. Oh, I've also done actual Kung Fu, and have a black belt in Tae Kwon Do.

I run. I meditate. I dance. I blog at PaulSpoerry.com, tweet @PaulSpoerry, and I'm here on Google+.

I'm currently work for IBM developing web enabled insurance applications for IBM and support and develop a non-profit called The LittleBigFund.

Comments

  1. Andrew Jones-McGuire says

    December 28, 2016 at 7:38 pm

    The whole using data from the smart water meter is pretty chilling…..

  2. Thomas Wrobel says

    December 29, 2016 at 8:08 am

    I still don't see why they need to keep any recordings at all for these devices. You can respond to voice commands just fine without keeping the original speech anywhere. At least, anywhere beyond a few minutes. Process and discard.
    Of course I can understand having lots of speech files on hand is useful for software training, but that shouldn't be standard/default.

    As for requests for information, always seemed pretty simple to me – court order or nothing. I can appreciate in some situations the lesser evil is handing data over, but it should never be a defacto standard part of a investigation.

  3. Andrew Jones-McGuire says

    December 29, 2016 at 8:15 am

    +Thomas Wrobel Just like Google – I assume they use the recorded samples in order to further improve accuracy of the natural language processing and speech to text capabilities. When an improvement is made to either system – you really need a huge chunk of readily available data to run through it to ensure it a) is not less accurate than it was and b) has some measurable improvement.

  4. Thomas Wrobel says

    December 29, 2016 at 10:31 am

    "Of course I can understand having lots of speech files on hand is useful for software training, but that shouldn't be standard/default."

  5. Andrew Jones-McGuire says

    December 29, 2016 at 10:55 am

    +Thomas Wrobel The number of people who would actually opt-in to this in these "oh my god think of my privacy" days – would be stupidly small – and as the biggest use of speech samples is for dealing with accents – we would just be sat in 20 years time with systems that still couldn't cope with anyone that wasn't speaking in "ideal" English.

  6. Paul Spoerry says

    December 29, 2016 at 11:12 am

    Alexa doesn't keep anything until you hit her key word. So while it's always listening, it's not doing anything with it (by which I mean communicating with Amazon) until you wake it up. You do voice training 25 times (per device I think… I've only set up two of the three I got for xmas so far) from multiple places in each room and per user. After that… until you say, "Alexa <insert query>" she's not sending anything.

    This just proves how naive our police and judicial systems are on technology. Unless the murderer said, "Alexa… how to I murder this person?" there's nothing there. To my knowledge, Alexa will not call 911 either 😉

  7. Thomas Wrobel says

    December 30, 2016 at 7:07 pm

    I don't know the feature set of alexa, but it seems possible if there was, say,a request for directions, that might be relevant for a case. I mean, it would still be a fairly stupid thing for criminal to do, but then, many are fairly stupid.
    —
    +Andrew Jones-McGuire Then Id suggest people making these things might have to offer cash or some other financial intensive for helping to develop software.
    Because having everyones every request logged somewhere potentially forever IS a privacy issue. This isnt like people getting worked up over say, context based advertising.Theres much more scope for a abuse here.
    This is a post snowden world, you cant trust that data is safe forever no mater how much you trust Amazon/Google/Apple themselves.

  8. Andrew Jones-McGuire says

    December 30, 2016 at 7:19 pm

    +Thomas Wrobel true, but just like Google – you can log in to your account and click "delete" to erase all your saved voice recordings

  9. Paul Spoerry says

    December 31, 2016 at 10:48 am

    Just because you can delete your info doesn't mean Google delete's all of it. From their page, "When you delete items from My Activity, they are permanently deleted from your Google Account. However, Google may keep service-related information about your account, like which Google products you used and when, to prevent spam and abuse and to improve our services." – https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/465?co=GENIE.Platform%3DDesktop&hl=en

    Amazon states it will delete it if you do so… but doesn't make mention of if THEY completely remove your recordings or retain them for some period of time. – https://smile.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=201602040&sa-no-redirect=1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright © 2023 · Epik on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in